US Housing Regulator...

US Housing Regulator to Probe Crypto’s Role in Mortgage Eligibility

By José Oramas June 25, 2025 In Cryptocurrency, Digital Asset

Miniature houses with bitcoin symbols sit on a keyboard, illustrating cryptocurrency in real estate and digital assets. — Source:AdobeStock

The FHFA is exploring whether digital assets like Bitcoin and stablecoins can be factored into mortgage qualification, with input from Strategy’s Michael Saylor on BTC-backed credit models.
Newly appointed FHFA Director William Pulte, a Trump nominee with deep real estate and crypto ties, will lead the review, though no timeline has been announced.
Crypto mortgages exist but face hurdles like overcollateralisation and SEC rules. The FHFA’s move could reshape how crypto wealth is evaluated in US housing finance.

The US housing regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), is eyeing the use of crypto funds as part of the mortgage approval process.

FHFA Director William Pulte said on Tuesday that the agency will examine how digital assets like Bitcoin and stablecoins could factor into mortgage qualifications.

No timeline or further details were given. Strategy’s Michael Saylor chimed in offering the firm’s BTC Credit as a potential model, which Pulte took into consideration.

We have developed a BTC Credit model that we are happy to share. It takes into account Loan Duration, Collateral Coverage, BTC Price, BTC Volatility, and BTC ARR outlook to generate statistical BTC Risk and BTC Credit spreads. Try it now on our website:https://t.co/uTlyGWdoMu
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) June 24, 2025

Pulte took office as FHFA director on March 14 following a Trump nomination, bringing both real estate lineage and crypto enthusiasm to the role. He is the grandson of William Pulte, the founder of Pulte Homes (currently the third-largest homebuilder in the country) and heads his own investment firm, Pulte Capital Partners.

Crypto Mortgages Aren’t Easy

Recall that crypto-backed mortgages already exist, yes, but there are a few (several) limitations, as it works as a niche product. For instance, platforms like Milo and Ledn allow users to lock up Bitcoin or other tokens as collateral to borrow fiat for real estate purchases, but they come with strict overcollateralisation and liquidation clauses that often deter users from using their crypto on mortgages.

Until this year, crypto integration in banking products was blocked by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121, which forced public companies to treat customer crypto holdings as liabilities, an accounting stance that more than anything distorted balance sheets and discouraged large lenders from offering crypto-backed services.

The FHFA was created in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, with the objective of maintaining stability and liquidity in the housing finance system, overseeing the government-sponsored enterprises that underwrite the majority of US mortgages.

It will be interesting to see how cryptocurrencies will be managed in this scenario. We’re talking about how volatility in the crypto market could trigger risk adjustments in loan-to-value ratios, whether stablecoins could be used on par with fiat reserves, verification of asset ownership across wallets, etc.