Advertisement
Kalshi Sues Nevada and New Jersey, Defends Event Markets as Risk Hedges
- Prediction market platform Kalshi has filed a lawsuit against the Nevada Gaming Control Board and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement.
- This follows a cease-and-desist order regarding sports betting from both entities.
- Kalshi claims to be a swaps platform and therefore to fall under the regulatory domain of the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not that of state gaming regulators.
Following cease-and-desist orders relating to sports betting, Kalshi has filed a lawsuit against state regulatory bodies Nevada Gaming Control Board and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement.
Kalshi argues that their event contracts are not like traditional sports betting models where the house controls the odds, but instead operate as a two-sided swap market.
This reasoning is the basis for Kalshi declaring they should fall under the regulatory authority of the CFTC as opposed to that of state gaming regulators.
We are proud to be the company that has pioneered this technology and stand ready to defend it once again in a court of law.
Tarek Mansour, Kalshi Co-founder. Additionally, Nevada had already issued a cease-and-desist order regarding Kalshi’s election-based contracts. Those contracts were, however, confirmed as legal by a judge in September of 2024.
Prediction markets are a critical innovation of the 21st century, and like all innovations, they are initially misunderstood.
Tarek Mansour, Kalshi Co-founder. Related: ATO Scrutiny Could Increase for Everyday Investors: Crypto Tax Exec
A Shifting Regulatory Environment
With a change of government in the US, so too has the regulatory strategy of its administrative bodies changed.
This shift generally encompasses a move away from regulation by enforcement. More specifically in the case of the CFTC, a greater focus on victims of fraud is instead coming to the forefront of their attention.
Note, early last month in February, the CFTC announced they were reviewing prediction contracts regarding the Super Bowl offered by Kalshi and Crypto.com. The goal was to ensure that the event contracts complied with derivatives laws in the US. Ultimately no action was taken against Kalshi or Crypto.com in this regard.
This regulatory shift has been a welcome sign for the crypto markets in general, which have undergone several years of regulation by enforcement, often with no clear regulatory guidelines to follow.
However, clearly prediction markets still have some delicate points which are being ironed out. This can not only affect just Kalshi but also other prediction-based markets, including the popular prediction-market Polymarket.
Advertisement
Tarek Mansour, Co-founder of Kalshi, recently announced Kalshi’s plans to sue the states of Nevada and New Jersey. Kalshi mentions that every effort was made to engage proactively with Nevada and New Jersey, with an education-focused approach which fell on deaf ears.
Prominent tech billionaire and entrepreneur Elon Musk recently mentioned both Kalshi and Polymarket in regards to a probability prediction.
Related: Wyoming Tests First State-Level Stablecoin, Tether CEO Declares Start of ‘Stablecoin Multiverse’
Author
Matthew Sell
Matthew is an avid writer with a wealth of experience in the blockchain and FinTech industries. Matthew has also honed his writing skills through his tertiary studies in creative writing at the University of Oxford.
