EU Scraps Plans to Ban Proof-of-Work Following Backlash

In what has been heralded as a victory for Bitcoin, European lawmakers have backtracked on provisions in a crypto regulation bill that would have effectively banned proof-of-work (POW) tokens, most notably Bitcoin.

European Union Parliament’s U-Turn

Following outcry among miners and the broader investment community, German outlet BTC Echo first reported that the controversial provisions of the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) bill had been struck.

Just days ago, Crypto News Australia highlighted the significant impact that may result from a ban which provided that by 2025, “no crypto assets could be created, sold, or traded within the EU if they used environmentally unsustainable consensus mechanisms”.

Most construed this as a de facto ban on Bitcoin, given that by 2025 it would likely be the only digital asset of value still using POW. This is, of course, assuming that Ethereum successfully transitions to proof-of-stake, a process that is apparently well under way.

Stefan Berger, a German EU member of parliament, was tasked with driving the legislative change and took to Twitter saying:

Correct is: The paragraph is no longer in the text. The report has yet to be voted on in committee. In this vote we will then see where the majorities lie. The decision has not yet been made.

Stefan Berger, Twitter (translated)

According to Berger, the vote on MiCA was originally scheduled for February 28, but since the deletion of the offending paragraphs, the vote has been postponed for an indeterminate period.

Bitcoin Battles ESG

With the risk of China nationalising miners well and truly behind us, it’s become evident that ESG (environment, social and governance) concerns are presently one of Bitcoin’s greatest hurdles to overcome.

Even though Bitcoin consumes less than 0.05 percent of global energy, of which more than 60 percent originates from sustainable sources, the bigger challenge seems to be persuading detractors that it has any value at all.

As long as one fails to see the value of Bitcoin and the importance of POW to security and decentralisation, from their perspective the appropriate amount of energy consumption is likely zero.